<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEWS: Did QuickPWN.com Rip Off The Dev Team&#8217;s iPhone Jailbreak?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetcracker.com/2009/06/news-did-quickpwn-rip-off-the-dev-teams-iphone-jailbreak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetcracker.com/2009/06/news-did-quickpwn-rip-off-the-dev-teams-iphone-jailbreak/</link>
	<description>Take Your Gadgets To The Next Level!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:08:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RagnaParadise</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetcracker.com/2009/06/news-did-quickpwn-rip-off-the-dev-teams-iphone-jailbreak/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>RagnaParadise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetcracker.com/?p=134#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Thanks. In fact it was only 2 days ago that I have decided to be more proactive in exposing the unscrupulous acts of the QuickPWN team, or so they claim to be. 

The Dev Team has expressed anger over the actions of the QuickPWN team, because they have gained money from the absurd number of Google AdSense advertisements placed all over the site. 

Also a thing to note: While the legality of jailbreaking is still being argued over, unlocking the iPhone for use with other carriers (whatever it may be) is perfectly legal. Stated under one of the anti-circumvention exemptions of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, &quot;Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network.&quot; This exemption will expire this year (3-year period for exemption; approved 2006) so it remains unseen, but EFF sure is arguing that jailbreaking is beneficial. Let&#039;s hope for the best. (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. In fact it was only 2 days ago that I have decided to be more proactive in exposing the unscrupulous acts of the QuickPWN team, or so they claim to be. </p>
<p>The Dev Team has expressed anger over the actions of the QuickPWN team, because they have gained money from the absurd number of Google AdSense advertisements placed all over the site. </p>
<p>Also a thing to note: While the legality of jailbreaking is still being argued over, unlocking the iPhone for use with other carriers (whatever it may be) is perfectly legal. Stated under one of the anti-circumvention exemptions of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, &#8220;Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network.&#8221; This exemption will expire this year (3-year period for exemption; approved 2006) so it remains unseen, but EFF sure is arguing that jailbreaking is beneficial. Let&#8217;s hope for the best. (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetcracker.com/2009/06/news-did-quickpwn-rip-off-the-dev-teams-iphone-jailbreak/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetcracker.com/?p=134#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I wrote a blog about this (blog.willbenson.com) but YES...he did rip off the devs. I know the dev team DEFINITELY feels this is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a blog about this (blog.willbenson.com) but YES&#8230;he did rip off the devs. I know the dev team DEFINITELY feels this is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
